Showing posts with label history. Show all posts
Showing posts with label history. Show all posts

Friday, November 22, 2013

A blog post fifty years in the making


Imagine you are a housewife. It’s late November, 1963. Your kids are at school, your husband is at work.


You could be vacuuming the living room rug, or ironing the family laundry. You could have the Better Homes and Gardens cookbook open in the kitchen, wondering if you should try something new for next week’s Thanksgiving dinner. Why not – it’s already three years into this bright new decade.


Maybe a diversion will help you think. A diversion like, say, “As The World Turns” on CBS. Watching other people’s problems will remind you of just how good you have it.


And then this happens:




Fifty years ago today, America experienced what is still its best-known collective trauma. (9/11 is still too new.)  The assassination of President John F. Kennedy has been described as a bellwether for many changes, from the end of innocence to the dawn of cynicism.
 
Photo credit: Wikipedia

I cannot agree with the “end of innocence” notion. A country with a history saturated not only with wars, but with violence of all stripes – slavery, racism, colonialism, union-busting, and all of the rage that fills the difference between what America promises and what America actually can give – no way can it be called “innocent”. JFK’s explosive murder was just one in an endless series of outrages.


As far as the “dawn of cynicism” – well, I agree that after JFK’s death, the American people drifted, slowly but surely, into a widespread cynicism about the government, up to and including blaming it for the President’s death. Now, I believe in healthy skepticism about everything – including, and especially, the “leaders” who in fact work for we, the people.


However, there is a difference between healthy skepticism and unhealthy indulgence in bullshit.


I do not believe that the government orchestrated 9/11 – and I do not believe it killed JFK, either.


Why is it so hard to believe that a lone gunman could kill the most important man in the world? It was so easy, especially when that important man was riding in an open-topped car. It was also easy, back in 1963, for an angry nightclub owner to shoot a suspect in an presidential assassination in a police station basement. 

Photo credit: Wikipedia

(Fred Kaplan of Slate.com has written a terrific article debunking the most pervasive conspiracy theories.)



I was not alive, or even conceived, on that dark day in 1963. But the images, memories, emotions of that day are accessible to anyone by opening a book – or a link. It doesn’t matter what you think (or don’t think) about JFK – it matters that you do think about this day in history, and that you understand why it matters.




 I will never forget this.



NaBloPoMo November 2013
 

Monday, December 26, 2011

Why I don’t buy year-end issues anymore


Year-end magazines – they bloom like poinsettias at this time of year. From Time to People, editors feel a need to eulogize the ebbing year – even though the year doesn’t actually end until 11:59:59 p.m. on December 31st (so there’s still time for major news to pop up – it’s like writing a book about a television series before the last episode airs).

These issues used to mean much more to me. When I was 14, I was really excited about the end-of-year issues. I remember buying this issue of the newly revived Life magazine in December 1979 – which was not just the end of a year, but the end of a decade.*



When I was 14, I was just becoming aware of the parade of progress – and it was exciting, like riding a sailboat and feeling the splash of the ocean. I felt that I was a part of history, even if my participation only consisted of buying year-and-decade-end issues.

Thirty-odd years later, however, the parade of progress has lost some luster. It’s not that I don’t care about news anymore. It’s just that I am seeing a truth that doesn’t come to light until you’ve ridden the merry-go-round a certain number of times: the more things change, the more they remain the same.

What is going to happen in 2012?

• Crimes will happen that will shock and disgust us.
• Stories of personal triumph will bring tears to our eyes.
• Famous people will die.
• People not previously famous will become so.
• Celebrity couples will get together, marry, have babies, and break up – and some of those breakups will shock us.
• Politicians will unleash their inner fools (especially in this election year!).
• New words will enter the lexicon (and be so totally out by next year).
• A public figure will say something outrageous and then quickly give a P.R. apology.
• Disasters, natural and man-made, will bring upheaval to thousands of lives.
• A few sports fans will have good reason to cheer – but most will not.

Check back here on December 31, 2012 (at 11:59:59 pm!), and tell me that not all of these have happened.

My days of collecting year-end issues are long over (which is a blessing, because the amount of paper already in the Hakim household has passed the “sufficient” category). Now it’s time to keep an eye on my personal parade of progress – to make some history of my own!

* Yes, I know that 1980 was the technical end of the decade – but come on, nobody thinks of it that way. Not even mathematicians.